The Fail reports that – according to the headline – "”Christians [are] a minority at ‘biased’ BBC where staff are more likely to be atheists or non-believers”
Wait a cotton-picking minute, aren’t atheists the same thing as non-believers? I suppose the count might include those damnable fence-sitting agnostics, but either way this seems a clear attempt to dilute the number of atheists. Times are bad, unbelievers are among us, but at least they’re not all atheists. We couldn’t allow atheists to be wandering around in a television company unpersecuted, could we?
Ah, but this is a story about persecution, isn’t it?
The new research has been seized on by critics who accuse the Corporation of bias against Christianity and marginalising the faith in its output.
Because ‘only’ 22.5% of staff said they were Christian.
And there’s the story laid bare. It’s OK to discriminate against atheists, but not against Christians. Christians are automatically preferred staff and something must be done to thin out the atheist ranks.
I mean just look at this:
The survey found that just 22.5 per cent of all staff professed to be Christians.
Yet the combination of those who said they were atheists and those who had no faith came to a total of 23.5 per cent.
What do you mean “yet”? It’s an implied assumption that – at the very least – Christian staff should outnumber atheists. It’s pure bigotry.
Random BBC employee Roger Bolton said:
There is an inbuilt but unconscious bias against religion, fuelled by the fact staff are not representative of the public. It is not a conspiracy but it needs a correction.
What kind of ‘correction’? This can really only mean the sacking of atheists in favour of Christians or the hiring of Christians instead of atheists in new appointments.
Then a random Catholic opined that the BBC is:
…institutionally incapable of reflecting the society it serves since BBC staff are not representative of the audience they broadcast to.
I can’t imagine what this means. Would more catholic canteen staff or technicians quantitatively change the nature of the BBC’s output? It’s a familiar and stupid argument. What they mean, of course, is that they want to have more influence on what’s broadcast. They are quite aware that this has nothing to do with the religious affiliation of random BBC staff, but sense an opportunity for bigotry which they just can’t bring themselves to ignore.
Well, Catholic Church and Independent Christian Broadcasting Council, I accuse you of being institutionally incapable of reflecting the society you serve since we have a lot of atheists and people of non-Christian religions in this country. Surely the composition of staff in your organisations should precisely reflect that mix?